Finally, the news is good. Get the inside scoop.
Universities cope with educational fraud.
The Miss-Lou’s breaking news:
Election races and runoffs are still in the picture.
will get more than $1 million.
Jobs picture is still not what it should be.
Wilkinson County does new road
The Advice Goddess:
This woman won’t sponge off her man.
Terry Savage on money:
Consumers battle inflation and deflation.
McAllister on health:
Too much milk is not good for you.
Thomas Sowell thinking clearly:
Just what happened on election day?
direction in the November election.
Tourists and pilgrims welcome:
It’s perfect fall weather. Now’s the time to visit Natchez and Vidalia.
Win cash or prizes!
More winners and more contests: Win $200 in gas!
More good writing:
Read another edition of The Rinaldi Report on
Casino sheen is fading
by Charlie Mitchell
As with many public policies, the idea of a
government-set minimum wage started small.
It was 1938 when federal law first required private employers
to pay at least 25 cents per hour. Not every worker. Just those engaged in
Things have changed. Specifically, while Congress has been stalled,
more and more states have gotten into the game.
When the new year arrives in a few weeks, the minimum wage
will rise in nine states due to changes already made in those states’ laws.
Last week, five more states held votes related to state minimums. Voters
nodded their approval in each and every one.
From a philosophical viewpoint, most interesting was
Setting a minimum wage is considered progressive or liberal.
Some people still label such mandates as socialist or communist (as were
many “New Deal” ideas that often wound up before to the Supreme Court in the
1930s). To say the least, minimum wage laws are in no way part of the
Yet in Arkansas, on the same day voters dumped
incumbent U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor, a Democrat, in favor of super-conservative
U.S. Rep. Tom Cotton, they approved raising the state minimum wage above the
federal minimum for the first time ever.
Arkansans voted strongly “red” and strongly “blue” on the
The federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour and has been since
The District of
Columbia is at $9.50 per hour and boasts the maximum
minimum for the time being. But 23 states have minimum wage laws requiring
that most workers be paid more than the federal minimum.
In the voting last week, Arkansans increased the minimum to
$8.50 by 2017. Two other often-red states, South Dakota and
Nebraska, voted for increases to $8.50 and $9 in
coming months. Alaska, a mostly blue state, will be at $9.75
in 2016. Illinois
voters cast advisory ballots suggesting their lawmakers pass a minimum wage
In Mississippi, memory says that state minimum wage bills
have been filed, but not one has ever made it so far as a floor debate or
even a serious discussion. Although traditionally led by legislators who
claim they are “for the people,” rarely have such claims resulted in any
protections or benefits for wage earners. Instead, big business continues to
carry the day in the halls of the Legislature. The fear that wage minimums
reduce jobs prevails.
Only four other states have this total aversion to minimum
wage — our neighbors Tennessee,
Louisiana and Alabama
and our cousin South Carolina.
Other states — those without minimums higher than the federal government —
have laws essentially ratifying the federal minimum and applying it to
employers doing business on their turf. Now the economic argument to have a
minimum wage is one thing. It puts more jingle in the pockets of consumers
and can stir up economic activity.
At the other end, capitalism in its purist form says the
marketplace should control, that no government should have any voice in any
financial arrangement between employers and employees.
But this topic has many other aspects, including political.
In several states, minimum
wage matters have been steered onto ballots as “wedge issues.” The idea is
to bring to polling places those who have strong feelings about a topic and
who may not have strong feelings about political candidates. While they’re
there, the thinking goes, they’ll add a checkmark for the candidates they
think most likely to support their positions.
abortion-related matters were on several state ballots last week and on Mississippi ballots in 2011. The notion was
that voters who wanted more laws against abortion would take the opportunity
to add limits and, while they were at it, elect more conservatives.
It didn’t work out that way
in Mississippi. Proposition
26 to limit abortions failed in even though the same election saw more
conservatives — and more conservative conservatives — put into office.
Similarly, more liberal
voters might have been thinking strategically — that adding a minimum wage
provision to ballots would bring out more voters who would want the pay
hikes and, while they were at it, vote for Democrats.
It didn’t work out that way
in Arkansas or the other
states last week, either. A lot of really conservative voters cast their
ballots in favor of government-forced boosts in minimum pay.
By the way, President Obama
still favors an increase to $10.10 as the federal minimum. The people may
But they elected people who don’t. It
never gets boring
Charlie Mitchell is a Mississippi journalist. Write to him at